American Political Development

The Methodology of Political Development

  • Anderson, Charles W. 1975. “System versus Strategy in Comparative Policy Analysis: A Plea for Contextual and Experiential Knowledge,” in Perspectives in Public Policy-Making. W.B. Gwyn and G.C. Edwards III, eds. Tulane University Press.
  • Archdeacon, Thomas J. 1994. Correlation and Regression Analysis: A Historians Guide. University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Azari, Julia R. and Jennifer K. Smith. 2012. “Unwritten Rules: Informal Institutions in Established Democracies.” Perspectives on Politics 10:1 (March), 37-55
  • Bennett, Andrew and Jeffrey T. Checkel, eds. 2014. Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge University Press.
  • Bloch, Marc. 1953. The Historian’s Craft. Vintage.
  • Breisach, Ernst. 1994. Historiography: Ancient, Medieval, and Modern. University of Chicago.
  • Brady, Henry E. and David Collier (eds.). 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Bridges, Amy. 2000. “Path Dependence, Sequence, History, Theory.” Studies in American Political Development 14(1): 93-112 (Spring).
  • Bunzl, Martin. 2004. “Counterfactual History: A User’s Guide.” American Historical Review 109(3): 845-858.
  • Bucheli, Marcelo and R. Daniel Wadhwani, eds. 2014. Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods. Oxford University Press.
  • Carr, E.H. 1990. What is History? Penguin.
  • Castles, Francis G. 1989. “Introduction: The Puzzles of Political Economy,” in The Comparative History of Public Policy. Francis G. Castles, ed.Oxford University Press.
  • Collier, David. 1993. “The Comparative Method,” in Political Science: The State of the Discipline II. Ada W. Finifter, ed. American Political Science Association 1993. 105-120.
  • Crowley, Robert, ed. 1999. What If? The World’s Foremost Historians Imagine What Might Have Been. G.P. Putnam’s and Sons.
  • David, Paul A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review 75(2):332-337.
  • David, Paul A. 1994. ‘‘Why Are Institutions the ‘Carriers of History’?: Path Dependence and the Evolution of Conventions, Organizations, and Institutions.’’ Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 5: 205–220.
  • Davidson, James West and Mark Hamilton Lytle. 1981. After the Fact: The Art of Historical Detection. Knopf.
  • Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science,” in Handbook of Political Science, Volume 7: Strategies of Inquiry. Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby, eds. Addison-Wesley.
  • Elster, Jon. 1978. Logic and Society: Contradictions and Possible Worlds. Wiley.
  • Ferguson, Niall, ed. 1999. Virtual History: Alternatives and Counterfactuals. Basic Books.
  • Frisch, Scott A., Douglas B. Harris, Sean Q. Kelly, and David C.W. Parker (eds.). 2012. Doing Archival Research in Political Science. Cambria Press.
  • Gaddis, John Lewis. 2002. The Landscape of History: How Historians Map the Past. Oxford University Press.
  • Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books.
  • George, Alexander L. and Andrew Bennett. 2004. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press.
  • George, Alexander L. 1979. “Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison,” in Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory, and Policy. Paul G. Lauren, ed. Free Press.
  • Gerth, H.H. and C. Wright Mills. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Oxford University Press.
  • Gerring, John. 2001. Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework. Cambridge University Press.
  • Gerring, John. 2004. “What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for?” American Political Sceince Review 98: 341-354.
  • Giddens, Anthony. 1979. The Constitution of Society. University of California Press.
  • Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. University of California Press.
  • Goertz, Gary and Harvey Starr, eds. 2002. Necessary Conditions: Theory, Methodology, and Applications. Rowman and Littlefield.
  • James, Bill. 2001. “The Meaning of Statistics,” in The New Bill James Historical Baseball Abstract. Free Press.
  • Jervis, Robert. 2000. “Timing and Interaction in Politics: A Comment on Pierson.” Studies in American Political Development. 
  • Kousser, J. Morgan. 1982.  “Restoring Politics to Political History.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 12:4 (Spring), 569-95.
  • LeBow, Richard Ned. 2000. “What’s So Different About a Counterfactual?” World Politics 52: 550-585.
  • Lieberman, Evan S. 2001. “Causal Inference in Historical Institutional Analysis: A Specification of Periodization Strategies.” Comparative Political Studies 34(9).
  • Lijphart, Arend. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review 65(3): 682-695.
  • Lustick, Ian. 1996. “History, Historiography, and Political Science: Multiple Historical Records and the Problem of Selection Bias.” American Political Science Review 90(3): 605-618 (September).
  • MacIver, A.M. 1968. “Levels of Explanation in History.” In Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, May Brodbeck, ed. Macmillan.
  • Mahoney, James and Kathleen Thelen (eds.). 2015. Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis.Cambridge University Press.
  • Mahoney, James and Kathleen Thelen, eds. 2009. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge University Press.
  • Morgan, Stephen L. and Christopher Winship. 2014. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press.
  • Nash, Gary B.,  Charlotte Crabtree, and Ross E. Dunn. 1997. History on Trial: Culture Wars and the Teaching of the Past. Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Pierson, Paul. 2005. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton University Press.
  • Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Not Just What, but When: Timing and Sequence in Political Processes.” Studies in American Political Development 14(1): 72-92 (Spring).
  • Peters, B. Guy, Jon Pierre and Desmond S. King. 2005. “The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism.” Journal of Politics 67(4):1275-1300 (November).
  • Rakove, Jack N. 1997. “The Origins of Judicial Review: A Plea for New Contexts.” 49 Stanford Law Review 1031.
  • Roe, Emery. 1994. Narrative Policy Analysis: Theory and Practice. Duke University Press.
  • Sewell, William H. 2005. Logics of History. University of Chicago Press.
  • Smith, Mark C. 1995. Social Science in the Crucible: The American Debate over Objectivity and Purpose, 1918-1941. Duke University Press.
  • Stake. Robert E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Sage.
  • Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 1987. Constructing Social Theories. University of Chicago Press.
  • Tetlock, Philip E. and Aaron Belkin. 1996. Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives. Princeton University Press.
  • Thelen, Kathleen. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States and Japan. Cambridge University Press.
  • Thelen, Kathleen. 2000. “Timing and Temporality in the Analysis of Institutional Change.” Studies in American Political Development 14(1): __ (Spring).
  • Tilly, Charles. 1984. Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. Russell Sage.
  • Tilley, Charles and Robert E. Goodin (eds.). 2006. The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis. Oxford University Press.
  • Trachtenberg, Marc. 2006. The Craft of International History: A Guide to Method. Princeton University Press.
  • Weber, Max. 1949. Methodology of the Social Sciences. Free Press.
  • Weir, Margaret. 2006. “When Does Policy Change? The Organizational Politics of Change,” in Rethinking Political Institutions: The Art of the State. Ian Shapiro, Stephen Skowronek, and Daniel Galvin, eds. New York University Press.
  • Whaley, Lindsay J. 1996. Introduction to Typology: The Unity and Diversity of Language. Sage.
  • Yin, Robert K. 2002. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed. Sage.
  • Yin, Robert K. 2002. Applications of Case Study Research, 2nd ed. Sage.
  • Zelizer, Julian E. 2010. “What Political Science Can Learn from the New Political History.” Annual Review of Political Science. 13: 25-36.